An Economy of Patriotism

PL 118-74: All-American Flag Act

The All-American Flag Act presents a low-risk, high-symbolism opportunity for businesses aligning with federal procurement trends favoring domestic manufacturing. While immediate financial gains may be modest, this law represents a lucrative niche within the larger Buy American movement. Beyond flag production, opportunities exist in certification services, supply chain tracking, compliance consulting, and digital marketplaces. Those who capitalize stand to benefit from stable government demand and the goodwill associated with producing a deeply symbolic American product.

“Patriotism is not short, frenzied outbursts of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.” — Adlai Stevenson

The All-American Flag Act (AAFA), Public Law 118-74, mandates that all U.S. flags procured by the federal government be entirely manufactured within the United States. Using 100% domestically sourced materials. Prior to 2024, federal procurement guidelines permitted up to 40% of U.S. flag components to be sourced from abroad—primarily from China, which accounted for 93% of the $6.5 million in flag imports in 2022. We’re going to assess the financial impact, compliance risks, grants, contracts, and business opportunities provided by this legislation.

The AAFA builds on decades of state-level "Buy American" initiatives (e.g., Arizona, Florida) and reflects growing bipartisan concerns over foreign reliance for national symbols. While previous federal regulations encouraged domestic sourcing, they were not comprehensive. This law explicitly mandates that all flags purchased by the U.S. government be both produced and assembled entirely within the United States. This Act complements existing "Made in USA" labeling requirements enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other agencies.

  • Introduced: June 14, 2023 (S.1973), by Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), with bipartisan cosponsors including Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joe Manchin (D-WV).

  • Key Amendment: An amendment by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) removed the mandate for manufacturers to maintain extensive record-keeping, thus streamlining compliance.

  • Enactment: Passed by unanimous Senate consent and a voice vote in the House, signed into law by President Biden on July 30, 2024. The law’s swift passage, aided by its narrow scope and strong patriotic appeal, reflects the country’s deepening commitment to "Buy American" initiatives, designed to fortify our manufacturing backbone.

Key Provisions

  • All federal agencies must purchase flags manufactured entirely in the U.S., with all materials sourced domestically.

  • The fabric, thread, dyes, and all materials used in the production of the flag must originate from U.S. sources.

  • Manufacturers must provide certifications confirming that each component of the flag—from fabric to thread—is sourced and processed within U.S. borders.

  • The cutting, sewing, and final assembly of the flags must occur in the United States.

  • Any violations or misrepresentations about sourcing or manufacturing location will result in penalties, fines, and potential exclusion from future government contracts.

  • All U.S. government entities—including federal agencies, the military, and more—must exclusively procure flags meeting these criteria.

  • The Government Accountability Office (GAO) holds the authority to audit purchases to ensure compliance, and contracting officers are now mandated to include American-made flag specifications in all relevant solicitations and contracts.

Exception for Certain Procurements

  • If a domestic flag cannot be procured at "market prices," agencies may bypass the requirements.

  • Purchases under the simplified acquisition threshold (~$250,000) are exempted from this law.

  • The President may issue a waiver to comply with international obligations under certain trade agreements.

  • Vessels in foreign waters

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the new legislation requiring American-made flags for federal use will have minimal fiscal impact. Adjustments for self-funded agencies like military exchanges are expected to be negligible. However, the policy creates new opportunities for domestic suppliers, as federal demand for flags could grow by approximately $500,000 annually.

For businesses, branding as a patriotic supplier could strengthen market positioning. The concept of what Sen. Sherrod Brown, framed as “economic patriotism,” appeals to consumers who prioritize American-made products. This legislation also benefits key segments within the textile industry, including U.S. cotton farmers, synthetic fiber producers, weaving and dyeing mills, and small- to medium-sized businesses engaged in cutting and sewing. These businesses may find it easier to compete for government contracts without facing competition from lower-cost international imports.

Logistics and distribution networks could see an uptick in demand as domestic production mandates increase shipping volumes for raw materials, fabrics, and finished flags. However, operational risks remain. The limited number of U.S. flag manufacturers—only three major producers as of 2023—could cause procurement challenges, particularly during peak demand periods such as national holidays. Price volatility is another concern, though a “market price” exception in the law aims to prevent monopolistic pricing. Higher domestic production costs may strain government budgets or reduce purchase volumes.

Strategically, businesses should target federal procurement channels like the General Services Administration (GSA) and military contracts while securing stable supply chains by partnering with the U.S.-based textile farms. Engaging with trade organizations, such as the National Flag Foundation, may also help influence future policy amendments or state-level adoption.

Beyond flag manufacturing, the legislation opens new entrepreneurial opportunities. Compliance consulting, supply chain certification, and digital platforms connecting domestic textile producers with flag makers could be lucrative. Specialized fabric production—such as weather-resistant or eco-friendly textiles—could also see growth. 

Strict compliance requirements add another layer of complexity. Federal agencies must verify supplier compliance through certifications and maintain detailed records for at least five years for potential audits. Businesses will need to ensure meticulous documentation to avoid regulatory penalties. Regulatory enforcement will be strict, requiring robust record-keeping. Supply chain bottlenecks could arise if domestic material suppliers fail to meet demand spikes.

Despite these hurdles, the law presents a significant opportunity for domestic manufacturers and entrepreneurs willing to navigate compliance and supply chain complexities. With strategic planning and innovation, businesses can capitalize on this wave of economic patriotism.

The federal government is a buyer of American flags, particularly through SAM.gov, the primary portal for government contracts. Those interested can set up keyword alerts and monitor solicitations referencing PL 118-74. The Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and Government-backed financial programs offer recurring opportunities along with helping businesses scale their operations.

  • SBA Loans & Grants: The Small Business Administration (SBA) offers funding options such as 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans.

  • State/Local Incentives: Many states provide tax incentives or grants to support local manufacturing.

  • Industry Associations: Groups like the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) offer networking opportunities and advocacy support.

Subcontracting can serve as a stepping stone. Large prime contractors frequently collaborate with smaller, specialized domestic producers or compliance consultants. Platforms like the SBA’s SubNet help smaller businesses connect with prime contractors. Procurement Technical Assistance Centers (PTACs) provide free or low-cost consulting services, helping businesses navigate the complexities of federal contracting. Additionally, attending trade shows and industry events focused on flags or textiles offers valuable networking. Also, consider alternative market entry tactics. Partnerships and joint ventures. Teaming agreements with well-established domestic manufacturers. 

Ecommerce and direct sales represent other lucrative markets, as patriotic consumers seek 100% American-made products, particularly around holidays like Independence Day and Memorial Day. Establishing a platform that emphasizes domestic compliance and authenticity can attract civic-minded buyers.

  1. Research: Analyze federal demand and identify competitors.

  2. Register: Complete SAM.gov registration and obtain necessary certifications (e.g., small business, SDVOSB).

  3. Source Domestically: Build a traceable, U.S.-based supplier network.

  4. Ensure Compliance: Establish systems for supply chain verification and record-keeping.

  5. Bid on Contracts: Monitor Beta.SAM.gov, use PTACs, and connect with prime contractors.

  6. Deliver & Document: Fulfill contracts efficiently while maintaining strict compliance.

  7. Scale & Expand: Leverage past performance to pursue larger contracts and diversify into related markets.

This assessment synthesizes data from congressional records, CBO analysis, and legislative histories to provide actionable insights.

“Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.” — Theodore Roosevelt

If this edition of the Novel Newsletter provided valuable insight, please share it with anyone who could benefit. Your support is appreciated.