The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) establishes a clear regulatory framework for digital assets, defining the boundaries between commodities—overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)—and securities, which fall under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These boundaries ensure that digital asset markets operate with greater transparency and legal certainty. Decentralized projects, exchanges, stablecoins, crowdfunding, and custody services all stand to profit from this clarity.

FIT21, or H.R. 4763, passed the House in May 2024 as an effort to foster growth in the U.S. digital asset industry. By delineating when digital assets are securities vs commodities, it forces a recalibration of agency roles, limiting redundant enforcement actions. FIT21 is not yet codified into law. Businesses and investors eyeing its provisions should tread carefully, factoring in possible amendments, regulatory shifts, or legislative hurdles that could reshape its final impact.

• Introduced in the House (118th Congress).

• Under review by relevant committees (e.g., House Financial Services Committee, House Agriculture Committee).

• Next steps may include amendments, committee votes, and a potential vote on the House floor before possibly moving to the Senate.

Digital commodities are classified as assets operating on a functional and decentralized blockchain, placing them under CFTC oversight. A blockchain meets the decentralization threshold if no single entity exerts control and no issuer or affiliate holds 20% or more of the asset or its voting power.

In contrast, restricted digital assets fall under SEC jurisdiction when the blockchain is functional but not decentralized. This classification treats them as securities, subjecting them to stricter investor protections and compliance requirements.

• Crowdfunding Exemption: Section 301 introduces an exemption allowing digital asset issuers to raise up to $75 million in a 12-month period; limiting non-accredited investor purchases to 10% of their annual income or net worth.

• Custody Requirements: The Act mandates that digital asset trading systems, brokers, dealers, and exchanges use qualified custodians for holding customer assets.

• Investor and Consumer Protections: The Act strengthens anti-fraud measures, cybersecurity standards, and consumer protections to promote trust in digital asset markets.

In a bold play, stablecoins are exempt from direct oversight by both the CFTC and SEC. This regulatory gap—whether a loophole or a strategic advantage—positions stablecoins for rapid adoption, clearing a path for them to solidify as a mainstream medium of exchange.

Table 1: Classification and Regulatory Authority

Permitted payment stablecoins are digital assets designed for payments and settlements. Issuers must maintain their value stability under federal or state regulation. These stablecoins are explicitly excluded from being classified as securities or digital commodities—except in cases of fraud or specific activities conducted by registered firms, as outlined in Section 101 of the act.

Better Markets argued the exemptions could weaken market oversight, pointing to fraud risks in unregulated stablecoin activities. While CoinDesk suggested the fraud exception ensures consumer protection without stifling innovation, though trading oversight remains a gray area pending CFTC/SEC rule-making.

Opportunity Assessment

By clarifying oversight, entrepreneurs may spend less on legal battles and extensive compliance guesswork, redirecting resources into product development and market growth.

Establishing a robust U.S. regulatory environment could make domestic fintech companies more competitive globally, reversing the trend of startups moving to more crypto-friendly jurisdictions.

• Entrepreneurs can provide decentralized blockchain networks classified as digital commodities under CFTC regulation, offering a clearer legal framework that attracts investment in DeFi (Decentralized Finance). Additionally, it opens options for launching exchanges and trading platforms registered with the CFTC.

• Beyond trading, digital assets require essential services—auditing, compliance, consulting, and technological support. Compliance tools to navigate CFTC and SEC regulations or offer security audits for blockchain networks will be needed.

• Federally or state-regulated stablecoins and related infrastructure to support their use in payments and settlements is another avenue.

• Custody services are increasingly vital as new regulations establish stricter standards. Entrepreneurs can create qualified custodial solutions that comply with federal or state oversight, ensuring secure storage for digital assets.

Clarity on whether tokens count as securities or commodities will boost investor confidence and lower legal barriers, supporting tokenization ventures. Entrepreneurs can create platforms for tokenizing real-world assets (e.g., real estate, commodities, intellectual property). As compliance barriers become clearer, both retail and institutional investors may gain access to regulated token sales and more transparent digital exchanges.

• Crowdfunding for Digital Assets: The new crowdfunding exemption allows investors to participate in digital asset project funding, with issuers able to raise up to $75 million.

• Derivatives and Financial Instruments: The act's provisions may encourage the development of derivatives based on digital commodities, regulated by the CFTC.

Businesses offering digital asset services must maintain compliance with existing AML and KYC regulations, ensuring strong identity verification and monitoring systems remain in place. Meanwhile, state-level fintech initiatives, such as those in Arizona and Wyoming, have established crypto-friendly regulatory frameworks. FIT21 could either supplement these efforts or introduce a federal baseline that streamlines or supersedes state rules.

Table 2: Opportunities

Tax implications also play a role, as the IRS continues refining its approach to digital assets. While FIT21 does not primarily focus on taxation, its classification of digital commodities versus securities could affect how gains and losses are reported, shaping future tax obligations for investors and businesses alike.

Risks & Challenges

Although FIT21 offers significant opportunities, it also presents challenges that must be navigated.

• Compliance with CFTC and SEC regulations, including registration and reporting requirements, can be costly, particularly for new entrants.

• The act's interpretation and enforcement may evolve—the classification of a digital asset as a commodity or security may be challenged.

• Digital assets operate globally, and differing international regulations can complicate operations.

• Legislative processes can stall or be amended significantly.

The Act has garnered mixed reactions. The SEC chair, Gary Gensler, expressed concerns, at SEC, arguing that FIT21 creates regulatory gaps and undermines investor protections. Conversely, the House Financial Services Committee, as noted in their press release, at House Financial Services Committee, views it as a step toward regulatory clarity and consumer safeguards.

As always, conduct thorough due diligence, monitor legislative proceedings, and seek expert legal and financial counsel.

Further Reading & Resources

• Congress.gov - 118th Congress (H.R.4763 Bill Text and Status)

• CFTC (Relevant Rules, Guidance)

• House Financial Services Committee

• GovTrack Bill Text H.R. 4763

• House Financial Services Committee Press Release

• SEC Statement on FIT21

If this edition of the Novel Newsletter provided valuable insight, please share it with anyone who could benefit. Your support is appreciated.